The entire profitability of the vehicle rental industry has been shrinking in recent years. Over the past five years, the has been struggling just as the remaining travel industry. In fact, involving the years 2001 and 2003 the US market has experienced a moderate decrease in the amount of profitability. Specifically, revenue rental appliances fell from $19.4 billion in 2000 to $18.2 billion in 2001. Subsequently, the entire industry revenue eroded further to $17.9 billion in 2002; an amount that's minimally higher than $17.7 billion that will be the entire revenue for the year 1999. In 2003, the experienced a barely noticeable increase which brought profit to $18.2 billion. Consequently of the economic downturn recently, a number of the smaller players which were highly dependent on the airline industry have inked a great deal of strategy realignments as a means of preparing their companies to cope with eventual economic adversities which could surround the industry. For the year 2004, on one other hand, the economic situation on most firms have gradually improved throughout the since most rental agencies have returned far greater profits relative to the anterior years. For instance, Enterprise realized revenues of $7.4 billion; Hertz returned revenues of $5.2 billion and Avis with $2.9 billion in revenue for the fiscal year of 2004. In accordance with industry analysts, the rental car industry is expected to experience steady growth of 2.6 percent in revenue over the following many years which results in a growth in profit.

Competitive Rivalry Among Sellers

There are numerous factors that drive competition within the vehicle rental industry. Over the past few years, broadening fleet sizes and increasing profitability has been the focus on most companies within the vehicle rental industry. Enterprise, Hertz and Avis one of the leaders have already been growing both in sales and fleet sizes. Additionally, competition intensifies as firms are constantly attempting to boost their current conditions and offer more to consumers. Enterprise has nearly doubled its fleet size since 1993 to approximately 600,000 cars today. Because the operates on such narrow profit margins, price competition is not a factor; however, most companies are actively associated with creating values and providing a variety of amenities from technological gadgets to even free rental to satisfy customers. Hertz, as an example, integrates its Never-Lost GPS system within its cars. Enterprise, on one other hand, uses sophisticated yield management software to manage its fleets.

Finally, Avis uses its OnStar and Skynet system to better serve the consumer base and offers free weekend rental if your customer rents a car for five consecutive days Moreover, the consumer foot of the rental car industry has relatively low to no switching cost. Conversely, rental agencies face high fixed operating costs including property rental, insurance and maintenance. Consequently, rental agencies are sensitively pricing there rental cars just to recoup operating costs and adequately meet their customers demands. Furthermore, because the experienced slow growth recently as a result of economic stagnation that led to a huge decline in both corporate travel and the leisure sector, most companies including the leaders are aggressively attempting to reposition their firms by gradually lessening the dependency level on the airline industry and regaining their footing in the leisure competitive arena.

The Potential Entry of new Competitors

Entering the vehicle rental industry puts new comers at a critical disadvantage. Over the past few years following economic downturn of 2001, most major rental companies have started increasing their market shares in the vacation sector of the as a means of insuring stability and lowering the amount of dependency involving the airline and the vehicle rental industry. While this trend has engendered long term success for the prevailing firms, it's heightened the competitive landscape for new comers. Because of the severity of competition, existing firms such as for instance Enterprise, Hertz and Avis carefully monitor their competitive radars to anticipate Sharpe retaliatory strikes against new entrants. Another barrier to entry is created because of the saturation amount of the industry.

As an example, Enterprise has brought the initial mover advantage having its 6000 facilities by saturating the leisure segment thereby placing not merely high restrictions on the most frequent distribution channels, but in addition high resource requirements for new firms. Today, Enterprise includes a rental location within 15 miles of 90 percent of the US population. Because of the network of dealers Enterprise has established around the nation, it has become relatively stable, more recession proof and most of all, less reliant on the airline industry in comparison to its competitors. Hertz, on one other hand, is utilizing the full spectrum of its 7200 stores to secure its position in the marketplace. Basically, the emergence of most of the industry leaders in to the leisure market not merely drives rivalry, but plus it varies directly with the amount of complexity of entering the vehicle rental industry.

The Threat of Substitute

There are numerous substitutes designed for the vehicle rental industry. From the technological standpoint, renting a car to go the distance for a meeting is really a less attractive alternative in place of video conferencing, virtual teams and collaboration software with which a company can immediately setup a meeting with its employees from anywhere around the globe at a cheaper cost. Additionally, you will find other alternatives including going for a cab which is really a satisfactory substitute relative to quality and switching cost, however it may not be as attractively priced as a rental car for the length of a day or more. While public transportation is the most cheap of the alternatives, it is more expensive in terms of the procedure and time it takes to reach one's destination. Finally, because flying offers convenience, speed and performance, it is really a very enticing substitute; however, it is an unattractive alternative in terms of price relative to renting a car. On the business enterprise segment, car rental agencies do have more protection against substitutes because so many companies have implemented travel policies that establish the parameters of when renting a car or employing a substitute is the better length of action.

In accordance with Tracy Esch, an Advantage director of marketing operations, her company rents cars up to a 200-mile trip before considering an alternative. Basically, the threat of substitute is fairly lower in the vehicle rental industry since the effects the substitute products have don't pose an important threat of profit erosion through the entire industry.

The Bargaining Power of Suppliers

Supplier power is lower in the vehicle rental industry. Because of the availability of substitutes and the amount of competition, suppliers do not have a great deal of influence in the terms and conditions of supplying the rental cars. Since the rental cars are usually purchased in bulk, rental car agents have significant influence on the terms of the sale since they possess the capacity to play one supplier against another to lessen the sales price. Another factor that reduces supplier power could be the absence of switching cost. That's, buyers are not affected from purchasing in one supplier over another and most of all, changing to different supplier's products is barely noticeable and does not affect consumer's rental choices.

The Bargaining Power of Buyers

Whilst the leisure sector has little if any power, the business enterprise segment possesses an important amount of influence in the vehicle rental industry. An appealing trend that's currently underway throughout the is forcing car rental companies to adapt to the needs of corporate travelers. This trend significantly reduces supplier power or the rental firms'power and increases corporate buyer power since the business enterprise segment is excruciatingly price sensitive,rental appliances well informed about the industry's price structure, purchase in larger quantities and they use the internet to force lower prices. Vacation buyers, on one other hand, have less influence on the rental terms. Because vacationers are usually less price sensitive, purchase in lesser amounts or purchase more infrequently, they've weak bargaining power.

Weergaven: 2

Opmerking

Je moet lid zijn van Beter HBO om reacties te kunnen toevoegen!

Wordt lid van Beter HBO

© 2024   Gemaakt door Beter HBO.   Verzorgd door

Banners  |  Een probleem rapporteren?  |  Algemene voorwaarden